Hello, friends! Welcome to this month’s meeting of the Insecure Writers’ Support Group, a blog hop created by Alex J. Cavanaugh and cohosted this month by J Lenni Dorner, Victoria Marie Lees, and Sandra Cox. Are you a writer? Do you feel insecure? Well, then this is the support group for you! Click here to learn more and to see a list of participating blogs.

Each month, IWSG asks members a question. The question is optional. I usually skip it, but this month’s question stirred up some deep feelings and some deep insecurities, so I thought I’d better address that. The question is:
Many writers have written about the experience of rereading their work years later. Have you reread any of your early works? What was that experience like for you?
I’ve mentioned before in these IWSG posts that I feel insecure about my role as a science communicator, given that I don’t have any formal scientific training or experience. So it’s a little jarring, when I’m looking for information about a specific space/science topic, to see my own blog posts pop up in search results. I sometimes forget, when I’m looking for information about a specific topic, that I’ve already covered that topic before.
Reading those old blog posts of mine—those blog posts I forgot I wrote—is not fun. They’re pretty cringy. The art (in my judgment) is bad, the writing is worse, and the jokes aren’t funny. However, setting aside these issues of style, the substance of my old blog posts is surprisingly decent. The important thing is this: I came looking for information about a specific space/science topic. Sometimes it’s a super niche topic that nobody on the Internet would think to write about (except me, apparently). And whatever information current me is looking for, past me provided it. Past me also did a good job citing his sources, usually, so if I want to learn more, I can learn more.
I still feel insecure about my place as a science blogger on the Internet. My writing could be better. My art could be better, too, and my jokes need work. But after rereading some of my old blog posts, I can feel reassured about this: I stick to the facts and communicate information well. I’m at least doing that part of the job right.
Thank you for this. It is encouraging to me that you can encourage yourself with these insights. It is the most fun to write about things about which you are passionate.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks! I’m glad you got something out of this! And yeah, if you’re not passionate about whatever you’re writing about, it’s no fun at all. If there’s no passion, it’s basically not worth doing.
LikeLike
That is crazy–past you having answers for some questions you’re having right now. I go to my old journals when I remember something–like which flavor was the cake at my brother’s tenth birthday:)
You think your past works need improvement because the current you have improved. That is a big win right?
Happy February!
LikeLiked by 1 person
–Rida from spotforyoubyme.blogspot.com
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s true. That is a win. I also take it as a reminder that I still have more improving to do in the future.
LikeLike
It’s great that you can see the good in your writing. We all see things we could write better or revise.
LikeLiked by 1 person
True. We’re always improving.
LikeLike
That’s cool your own blog posts show up in searches. Bet they aren’t as bad as you think, either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe so. Writers are our own worst critics.
LikeLike
I cringe every time I look at my early blog posts, so I know how you feel. But judging our own work is hard. And I’ve always found you a careful science communicator.
LikeLike
Hi,
Keep writing, you may surprise yourself and become that scientific writer that you really want to be.
Shalom shalom
LikeLike