Hello, friends! Welcome to the Insecure Writer’s Support Group, a blog hop created by Alex J. Cavanaugh and cohosted this month by Victoria Marie Lees, Kim Lajevardi, Nancy Gideon, and Cathrina Constantine. I’ve been an IWSG member for many years now, over on my previous blog, but this is my first IWSG post here on my new blog, I Love Space. If you’re a writer, and if you feel insecure about your writing life, click here to learn more about this amazingly supportive group and to see a list of participating blogs.
I just got back from an event in Washington D.C., an event where ordinary citizens (as opposed to professional lobbyists) got a chance to advocate for space exploration to U.S. lawmakers. I’ll have more to say about that in upcoming blog posts. Stay tuned! But there was one aspect of this experience that felt super relevant to the challenges of being a writer.
I’ve often felt like there’s an easy and obvious metaphor to be made between pursuing a writing career and running the U.S. space program. Both involve big dreams and lofty aspirations. Both involve shooting for the stars, so to speak. Both also involve some harsh economic realities. And in both cases, balancing those big dreams against those economic realities can be a real challenge.
As former NASA administrator Mike Griffin put it, there are the “real reasons” we explore space (our curiosity, our sense of awe and wonder), but there are also the “acceptable reasons” we must use to justify space exploration to Congress (job creation, spin-off technologies, planetary defense, and so forth). In a similar way, for us writers, there are the “real reasons” we write, but then there are the “acceptable reasons” we must use to justify ourselves if/when we chose to pursue writing as a career.
For me, the real reasons I write are, in fact, the same as the real reasons NASA exists: a sense of awe and wonder about the cosmos, plus a deep sense of curiosity about what else might be out there. That’s why I write this blog about space. And that’s also why I want to pursue a career writing science fiction. As for my “acceptable reasons,” well… I’m still working on those. Plenty of cynical people in my life have told me that my writing is good, but that I should stick to a more sensible, more economically viable career path. I’m never sure what to say to these people. But I’m working on it.
So, my fellow writers, what are the “real reasons” you write, and what are the “acceptable reasons” you use to justify yourself if you’re pursuing writing as a career?
P.S.: Former NASA Administrator Mike Griffin was recently interviewed on the Planetary Society’s podcast, as part of the lead-up to their big event in D.C. Click here to hear what Griffin himself has to say about the real reasons vs. the acceptable reasons for space exploration.